Trudeau knows that his “mandatory” pledge is unenforceable. He insists there would be “consequences” for any civil servant resisting a double jab, but even under questioning from reporters, Trudeau couldn’t say what those consequences would be.
Surely he knows that legal experts, including some within his own Justice department, have said a 100-per-cent, ironclad mandate would be unconstitutional.
It is possible to object on religious or conscience grounds. It might even be legally defensible to object on privacy grounds – your employer cannot compel you to prove you have taken basic medical actions you choose not to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment